skip to main content
research-article
Free Access
Just Accepted

Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis

Authors Info & Claims
Online AM:13 November 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recommender systems are the algorithms which select, filter, and personalize content across many of the world's largest platforms and apps. As such, their positive and negative effects on individuals and on societies have been extensively theorized and studied. Our overarching question is how to ensure that recommender systems enact the values of the individuals and societies that they serve. Addressing this question in a principled fashion requires technical knowledge of recommender design and operation, and also critically depends on insights from diverse fields including social science, ethics, economics, psychology, policy and law. This paper is a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize theory and practice from different perspectives, with the goal of providing a shared language, articulating current design approaches, and identifying open problems. We collect a set of values that seem most relevant to recommender systems operating across different domains, then examine them from the perspectives of current industry practice, measurement, product design, and policy approaches. Important open problems include multi-stakeholder processes for defining values and resolving trade-offs, better values-driven measurements, recommender controls that people use, non-behavioral algorithmic feedback, optimization for long-term outcomes, causal inference of recommender effects, academic-industry research collaborations, and interdisciplinary policy-making.

References

  1. Himan Abdollahpouri, Gediminas Adomavicius, Robin Burke, Ido Guy, Dietmar Jannach, Toshihiro Kamishima, Jan Krasnodebski, and Luiz Pizzato. 2020. Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions. 30, 1 (2020), 127–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09256-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Himan Abdollahpouri and Robin Burke. 2019. Multi-stakeholder recommendation and its connection to multi-sided fairness. (2019). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.13158Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel Adiwardana, Minh-Thang Luong, David R. So, Jamie Hall, Noah Fiedel, Romal Thoppilan, Zi Yang, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Gaurav Nemade, Yifeng Lu, and Quoc V. Le. 2020. Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbot. arXiv:2001.09977 [cs, stat] (February 2020). Retrieved November 30, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.09977Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David Adkins, Bilal Alsallakh, Adeel Cheema, Narine Kokhlikyan, Emily McReynolds, Pushkar Mishra, Chavez Procope, Jeremy Sawruk, Erin Wang, and Polina Zvyagin. 2022. Method Cards for Prescriptive Machine-Learning Transparency. Retrieved April 19, 2022 from https://conf.researchr.org/details/cain-2022/cain-2022/12/Method-Cards-for-Prescriptive-Machine-Learning-TransparencyGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Mehdi Afsar, Trafford Crump, and Behrouz Far. 2021. Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A survey. arXiv:2101.06286 [cs] (January 2021). Retrieved August 25, 2021 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06286v1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunt Allcott, Luca Braghieri, Sarah Eichmeyer, and Matthew Gentzkow. 2020. The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review 110, 3 (2020), 629–676. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow, and Lena Song. 2021. Digital Addiction. NBER. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w28936/w28936.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Md. Sayeed Al-Zaman. 2021. Prevalence and source analysis of COVID-19 misinformation in 138 countries. IFLA Journal (August 2021), 03400352211041135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211041135Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Elizabeth Anderson. 2001. Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 2 Unstrapping the straitjacket of ‘preference’: A comment on Amartya Sen's contributions to philosophy and economics. Economics & Philosophy 17, 1 (2001), 21–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267101000128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ruth A. Anderson, Lowel Worthington, William T. Anderson, and Glen Jennings. 1994. The development of an autonomy scale. Contemp Fam Ther 16, 4 (August 1994), 329–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196884Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. McKane Andrus, Elena Spitzer, Jeffrey Brown, and Alice Xiang. 2021. “What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand”: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness. arXiv:2011.02282 [cs] (January 2021). Retrieved September 18, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02282Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Charles Angelucci and Andrea Prat. 2021. Is Journalistic Truth Dead? Measuring How Informed Voters Are about Political News. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3593002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sinan Aral. 2016. The Future of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 121, 6 (May 2016), 1931–1939. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/686293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hannah Arendt. 1972. Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics, Civil Disobedience on Violence, Thoughts on Politics, and Revolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Andrew Arsht and Daniel Etcovitch. 2018. The Human Cost of Online Content Moderation. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (March 2018). Retrieved January 6, 2022 from https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/the-human-cost-of-online-content-moderationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nejla Asimovic, Jonathan Nagler, Richard Bonneau, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2021. Testing the effects of Facebook usage in an ethnically polarized setting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, 25 (June 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022819118Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Frederik Aust, Birk Diedenhofen, Sebastian Ullrich, and Jochen Musch. 2013. Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behav Res 45, 2 (June 2013), 527–535. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Christopher A. Bail, Lisa P. Argyle, Taylor W. Brown, John P. Bumpus, Haohan Chen, M. B. Fallin Hunzaker, Marcus Mann, Jaemin Lee, Alexander Volfovsky, and Friedolin Merhout. 2018. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. 115, 37 (2018), 9216–9221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Krisztian Balog, Filip Radlinski, and Shushan Arakelyan. 2019. Transparent, Scrutable and Explainable User Models for Personalized Recommendation. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jack Bandy. 2021. Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits. arXiv:2102.04256 [cs] (February 2021). Retrieved June 4, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04256Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021. More Accounts, Fewer Links: How Algorithmic Curation Impacts Media Exposure in Twitter Timelines. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3449152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Simon Baron-Cohen and Sally Wheelwright. 2004. The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. J Autism Dev Disord 34, 2 (April 2004), 163–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Alon Bartal, Nava Pliskin, and Oren Tsur. 2020. Local/Global contagion of viral/non-viral information: Analysis of contagion spread in online social networks. PLoS ONE 15, 4 (April 2020), e0230811. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230811Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jonathan Bassen, Bharathan Balaji, Michael Schaarschmidt, Candace Thille, Jay Painter, Dawn Zimmaro, Alex Games, Ethan Fast, and John C. Mitchell. 2020. Reinforcement Learning for the Adaptive Scheduling of Educational Activities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376518Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Christine Bauer and Alexander Novotny. 2017. A consolidated view of context for intelligent systems. AIS 9, 4 (June 2017), 377–393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-170445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Philip Baugut and Katharina Neumann. 2020. Online propaganda use during Islamist radicalization. Information, Communication & Society 23, 11 (September 2020), 1570–1592. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1594333Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Seth D. Baum. 2020. Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence. 35, 1 (2020), 165–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0760-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mesfin A. Bekalu, Rachel F. McCloud, and K. Viswanath. 2019. Association of Social Media Use With Social Well-Being, Positive Mental Health, and Self-Rated Health: Disentangling Routine Use From Emotional Connection to Use. Health Educ Behav 46, 2_suppl (December 2019), 69S-80S. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119863768Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Omer Ben-Porat, Gregory Goren, Itay Rosenberg, and Moshe Tennenholtz. 2019. From Recommendation Systems to Facility Location Games. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1772–1779. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Omer Ben-Porat and Moshe Tennenholtz. 2018. A Game-Theoretic Approach to Recommendation Systems with Strategic Content Providers. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc. Retrieved January 2, 2022 from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/a9a1d5317a33ae8cef33961c34144f84-Abstract.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Larwan Berke, Sushant Kafle, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2018. Methods for Evaluation of Imperfect Captioning Tools by Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Users at Different Reading Literacy Levels. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. B. Douglas Bernheim. 2016. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Unified Approach to Behavioral Welfare Economics. 7, 1 (2016), 12–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2016.5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Abraham Bernstein, Claes de Vreese, Natali Helberger, Wolfgang Schulz, Katharina Zweig, Christian Baden, Michael A. Beam, Marc P. Hauer, Lucien Heitz, Pascal Jürgens, Christian Katzenbach, Benjamin Kille, Beate Klimkiewicz, Wiebke Loosen, Judith Moeller, Goran Radanovic, Guy Shani, Nava Tintarev, Suzanne Tolmeijer, Wouter van Atteveldt, Sanne Vrijenhoek, and Theresa Zueger. 2020. Diversity in News Recommendations. (2020). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.09495Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Tulsee Doshi, Hai Qian, Li Wei, Yi Wu, Lukasz Heldt, Zhe Zhao, Lichan Hong, Ed H. Chi, and Cristos Goodrow. 2019. Fairness in recommendation ranking through pairwise comparisons. (2019), 2212–2220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Tulsee Doshi, Hai Qian, Allison Woodruff, Christine Luu, Pierre Kreitmann, Jonathan Bischof, and Ed H. Chi. 2019. Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvements. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 453–459. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314234Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Alex Beutel, Paul Covington, Sagar Jain, Can Xu, Jia Li, Vince Gatto, and Ed H. Chi. 2018. Latent Cross: Making Use of Context in Recurrent Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 46–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159727Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Asia J. Biega, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Gerhard Weikum. 2018. Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankings. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Robert M. Bond, Christopher J. Fariss, Jason J. Jones, Adam D.I. Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime E. Settle, and James H. Fowler. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. 489, 7415 (2012), 295–298. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Alexey Borisov, Ilya Markov, Maarten de Rijke, and Pavel Serdyukov. 2016. A context-aware time model for web search. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 205–214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Alan Borning and Michael Muller. 2012. Next Steps for Value Sensitive Design. In CHI ’12, 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Craig Boutilier. 2013. Computational Decision Support Regret-Based Models for Optimization and Preference Elicitation. In Comparative Decision Making. Oxford University Press, New York. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856800.003.0041Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Craig Boutilier, Richard S. Zemel, and Benjamin Marlin. 2003. Active collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-03), Acapulco, Mexico, 98–106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow, and Jesse Shapiro. 2017. Is the Internet Causing Political Polarization? Evidence from Demographics. (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3386/w23258Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Levi Boxell, Gentzkow, Matthew, and Jesse M Shapiro. 2020. Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w26669Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Lia Bozarth and Ceren Budak. 2020. Toward a Better Performance Evaluation Framework for Fake News Classification. 14, Icwsm (2020), 60–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Lia Bozarth, Aparajita Saraf, and Ceren Budak. 2020. Higher ground? how groundtruth labeling impacts our understanding of fake news about the 2016 U.S. presidential nominees. Icwsm (2020), 48–59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3340173Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. William J. Brady and Jay Joseph Van Bavel. 2021. Estimating the effect size of moral contagion in online networks: A pre-registered replication and meta-analysis. Open Science Framework. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s4w2xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. J Scott Brennen, Felix M Simon, Philip N Howard, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2020. Types, Sources, and Claims of COVID-19 Misinformation. Reuters Institute for Politics, University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Miles Brundage, Shahar Avin, Jasmine Wang, Haydn Belfield, Gretchen Krueger, Gillian Hadfield, Heidy Khlaaf, Jingying Yang, Helen Toner, Ruth Fong, Tegan Maharaj, Pang Wei Koh, Sara Hooker, Jade Leung, Andrew Trask, Emma Bluemke, Jonathan Lebensold, Cullen O'Keefe, Mark Koren, Théo Ryffel, JB Rubinovitz, Tamay Besiroglu, Federica Carugati, Jack Clark, Peter Eckersley, Sarah de Haas, Maritza Johnson, Ben Laurie, Alex Ingerman, Igor Krawczuk, Amanda Askell, Rosario Cammarota, Andrew Lohn, David Krueger, Charlotte Stix, Peter Henderson, Logan Graham, Carina Prunkl, Bianca Martin, Elizabeth Seger, Noa Zilberman, Adrian Weller, Brian Tse, Elizabeth Barnes, Allan Dafoe, Paul Scharre, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Martijn Rasser, Shagun Sodhani, Carrick Flynn, Thomas Krendl Gilbert, Lisa Dyer, Saif Khan, Yoshua Bengio, and Markus Anderljung. 2020. Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims. (2020). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07213v2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Axel Bruns. 2019. It's Not the Technology, Stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’ Metaphors Have Failed Us. (2019). Retrieved from http://snurb.info/node/2526Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. BSR. 2018. Human Rights Impact Assessment: Facebook in Myanmar.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Robin Burke. 2017. Multisided Fairness for Recommendation. arXiv:1707.00093 [cs] (July 2017). Retrieved October 5, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00093Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Colin F Camerer and Ernst Fehr. 2004. Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In Foundations of Human Sociality – Experimental and Ethnographic Evidence from 15 Small-Scale Societies. h.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Colin F. Camerer, George Loewenstein, and Matthew Rabin (Eds.). 2004. Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Rocío Cañamares, Pablo Castells, and Alistair Moffat. 2020. Offline evaluation options for recommender systems. Inf Retrieval J 23, 4 (August 2020), 387–410. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-020-09371-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Cansu Canca. 2020. Operationalizing AI ethics principles. Commun. ACM 63, 12 (November 2020), 18–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3430368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Micah Carroll, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Anca Dragan, and Stuart Russell. 2021. Estimating and Penalizing Preference Shift in Recommender Systems. RecSys ’21: Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3460231.3478849Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Ben Carterette, Evangelos Kanoulas, and Emine Yilmaz. 2012. Incorporating variability in user behavior into systems based evaluation. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, 135–144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Giuliana Carullo, Aniello Castiglione, and Alfredo De Santis. 2014. Friendship Recommendations in Online Social Networks. In 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, IEEE, Salerno, 42–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2014.114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Pablo Castells, Neil J. Hurley, and Saul Vargas. 2015. Novelty and diversity in recommender systems.. Springer US, 881–918. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_26Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Calvin Chan, Viknesh Sounderajah, Elisabeth Daniels, Amish Acharya, Jonathan Clarke, Seema Yalamanchili, Pasha Normahani, Sheraz Markar, Hutan Ashrafian, and Ara Darzi. 2021. The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Public Health Information Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 7, 7 (July 2021), e29942. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2196/29942Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Jakraphan Chaopreecha. 2019. Revitalization of Tradition through Social Media: A Case of the Vegetarian Festival in Phuket, Thailand. (2019), 35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Gilad Chen, Stanley M. Gully, and Dov Eden. 2001. Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods 4, 1 (January 2001), 62–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2020. Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions. arXiv:2010.03240 [cs] (October 2020). Retrieved September 2, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03240Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2004. Survey of Preference Elicitation Methods. (2004), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Minmin Chen, Alex Beutel, Paul Covington, Sagar Jain, Francois Belletti, and Ed H. Chi. 2019. Top-k off-policy correction for a reinforce recommender system. (2019), 456–464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3290999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Yan-Ying Chen, Tao Chen, Winston H. Hsu, Hong-Yuan Mark Liao, and Shih-Fu Chang. 2014. Predicting Viewer Affective Comments Based on Image Content in Social Media. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, ACM, Glasgow United Kingdom, 233–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2578726.2578756Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Zhilong Chen, Jinghua Piao, Xiaochong Lan, Hancheng Cao, Chen Gao, Zhicong Lu, and Yong Li. 2022. Practitioners Versus Users: A Value-Sensitive Evaluation of Current Industrial Recommender System Design. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (November 2022), 1–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3555646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Steve Chien, Prateek Jain, Walid Krichene, Steffen Rendle, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, and Li Zhang. 2021. Private Alternating Least Squares: Practical Private Matrix Completion with Tighter Rates. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 1877–1887. Retrieved January 7, 2022 from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/chien21a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Rumman Chowdhury. 2021. Sharing learnings about our image cropping algorithm. Twitter. Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/insights/2021/sharing-learnings-about-our-image-cropping-algorithmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Konstantina Christakopoulou, Filip Radlinski, and Katja Hofmann. 2016. Towards Conversational Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’16), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 815–824. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Jennifer Cobbe and Jatinder Singh. 2019. Regulating Recommending: Motivations, Considerations, and Principles. 10, 3 (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371830Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Council of Europe. 2020. Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_8_eng.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Cédric Courtois, Laura Slechten, and Lennert Coenen. 2018. Challenging Google Search filter bubbles in social and political information: Disconforming evidence from a digital methods case study. Telematics and Informatics 35, 7 (October 2018), 2006–2015. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Tim Cowlishaw, Todd Burlington, David Man, Jakub Fiala, Rhiannon Barrington, and George Wright. 2018. Personalizing the Public: Personalising Linear Radio at a Public Service Broadcaster. British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.ibc.org/personalising-the-public-linear-radio-/3293.articleGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Henriette Cramer, Vanessa Evers, Satyan Ramlal, Maarten van Someren, Lloyd Rutledge, Natalia Stash, Lora Aroyo, and Bob Wielinga. 2008. The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Model User-Adap Inter 18, 5 (August 2008), 455. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Mark Csikszentmihalyi. 2020. Confucius. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved October 21, 2021 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/confucius/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Alexander D'Amour, Katherine Heller, Dan Moldovan, Ben Adlam, Babak Alipanahi, Alex Beutel, Christina Chen, Jonathan Deaton, Jacob Eisenstein, Matthew D. Hoffman, Farhad Hormozdiari, Neil Houlsby, Shaobo Hou, Ghassen Jerfel, Alan Karthikesalingam, Mario Lucic, Yian Ma, Cory McLean, Diana Mincu, Akinori Mitani, Andrea Montanari, Zachary Nado, Vivek Natarajan, Christopher Nielson, Thomas F. Osborne, Rajiv Raman, Kim Ramasamy, Rory Sayres, Jessica Schrouff, Martin Seneviratne, Shannon Sequeira, Harini Suresh, Victor Veitch, Max Vladymyrov, Xuezhi Wang, Kellie Webster, Steve Yadlowsky, Taedong Yun, Xiaohua Zhai, and D. Sculley. 2020. Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning. (2020). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03395Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Abhinandan S. Das, Mayur Datar, Ashutosh Garg, and Shyam Rajaram. 2007. Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Aparna Das, Claire Mathieu, and Daniel Ricketts. 2009. Maximizing profit using recommender systems. (2009). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.3633Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Maria-Iuliana Dascalu, Constanta-Nicoleta Bodea, Monica Nastasia Mihailescu, Elena Alice Tanase, and Patricia Ordoñez de Pablos. 2016. Educational recommender systems and their application in lifelong learning. Behaviour & Information Technology 35, 4 (April 2016), 290–297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1128977Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Yashar Deldjoo, Markus Schedl, Paolo Cremonesi, and Gabriella Pasi. 2020. Recommender Systems Leveraging Multimedia Content. ACM Comput. Surv. 53, 5 (October 2020), 1–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3407190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Joaquin Delgado, Samuel Lind, Carl Radecke, and Satish Konijeti. 2019. Simple objectives work better. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2440/paper5.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Ángel Díaz and Laura Hecht-Felella. 2021. Double Standards in Social Media Content Moderation. Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved from https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/Double_Standards_Content_Moderation.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Fernando Diaz, Bhaskar Mitra, Michael D. Ekstrand, Asia J. Biega, and Ben Carterette. 2020. Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposure. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3411962Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Ed Diener. 2000. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 34–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Ed Diener, Robert A. Emmons, Randy J. Larsen, and Sharon Griffin. 1985. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 49, 1 (February 1985), 71–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Rachel Dodge, Annette P. Daly, Jan Huyton, and Lalage D. Sanders. 2012. The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing 2, 3 (August 2012). Retrieved December 2, 2021 from https://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/89Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Eileen Donahoe and Megan Macduffee Metzger. 2019. Artificial intelligence and human rights. 30, 2 (2019), 115–126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0029Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Evelyn Douek. 2020. The Limits of International Law in Content Moderation. SSRN Journal (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3709566Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Evelyn Douek. 2021. Governing Online Speech: From “Posts-as-Trumps” to Proportionality and Probability. 121, 3 (2021). Retrieved from https://columbialawreview.org/content/governing-online-speech-from-posts-as-trumps-to-proportionality-and-probability/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Matjaž Drev and Boštjan Delak. 2021. Conceptual Model of Privacy by Design. Journal of Computer Information Systems (July 2021), 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2021.1939197Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. M Z van Drunen, N Helberger, and M Bastian. 2019. Know your algorithm: what media organizations need to explain to their users about news personalization. International Data Privacy Law 9, 4 (November 2019), 220–235. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Gabriel Dulac-Arnold, Richard Evans, Hado van Hasselt, Peter Sunehag, Timothy Lillicrap, Jonathan Hunt, Timothy Mann, Theophane Weber, Thomas Degris, and Ben Coppin. 2015. Deep reinforcement learning in large discrete action spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.07679 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Kris Dunn and Shane P. Singh. 2014. Pluralistic conditioning: social tolerance and effective democracy. Democratization 21, 1 (January 2014), 1–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.697056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Cynthia Dwork and Aaron Roth. 2014. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 9, 3–4 (August 2014), 211–407. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Thomas Ehrlich. 2000. Civic responsibility and higher education. Oryx Press, Westport, Conn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Michael D. Ekstrand, Anabruta Das, Robin Burke, and Fernando Diaz. 2021. Fairness in Recommender Systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd ed.), Francesco Ricci, Lior Roach and Bracha Shapira (eds.). Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Michael D. Ekstrand, Anubrata Das, Robin Burke, and Fernando Diaz. 2022. Fairness in Information Access Systems. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 16, 1–2 (2022), 1–177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Michael D. Ekstrand, Mucun Tian, Ion Madrazo Azpiazu, Jennifer D. Ekstrand, Oghenemaro Anuyah, David McNeill, and Maria Soledad Pera. 2018. All The Cool Kids, How Do They Fit In?: Popularity and Demographic Biases in Recommender Evaluation and Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR, 172–186. Retrieved November 10, 2021 from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/ekstrand18b.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 4 (2007), 1143–1168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Jacob K. Eskildsen and Kai Kristensen. 2011. The gender bias of the Net Promoter Score. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Quality and Reliability, 254–258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICQR.2011.6031720Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. European Commission. 2016. General Data Protection Regulation. Retrieved November 19, 2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/ojGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. European Commission. 2022. Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). Retrieved October 10, 2023 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32022R2065Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Charles Evans and Atoosa Kasirzadeh. 2021. User Tampering in Reinforcement Learning Recommender Systems. arXiv:2109.04083 [cs] (September 2021). Retrieved September 27, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04083Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Carrie Exton and Michal Shinwell. 2018. Policy use of well-being metrics: Describing Countries’ Experiences. 33, 94 (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1787/d98eb8ed-enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Facebook. 2019. People, Publishers, the Community. Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved October 8, 2021 from https://about.fb.com/news/2019/04/people-publishers-the-community/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Facebook. 2021. Facebook's Corporate Human Rights Policy. Retrieved December 8, 2021 from https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Facebooks-Corporate-Human-Rights-Policy.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Facebook. 2021. Our Approach to Ranking. Facebook Transparency Center. Retrieved October 28, 2021 from https://transparency.fb.com/features/ranking-and-content/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Marc Faddoul, Guillaume Chaslot, and Hany Farid. 2020. A Longitudinal Analysis of YouTube's Promotion of Conspiracy Videos. (2020), 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Boi Faltings, Radu Jurca, Pearl Pu, and Bao Duy Tran. 2014. Incentives to Counter Bias in Human Computation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 59–66. Retrieved January 7, 2022 from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/HCOMP/article/view/13145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Jenny Fan and Amy X. Zhang. 2020. Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform Governance. (2020), 1–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Michael Feldman, Sorelle A. Friedler, John Moeller, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2015. Certifying and removing disparate impact. In proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 259–268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Miriam Fernandez and Alejandro Bellogín. 2020. Recommender Systems and Misinformation: The Problem or the Solution? In OHARS Workshop, 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Benjamin Fields, Rhianne Jones, and Tim Cowlishaw. 2018. The case for public service recommender algorithms‬. In FATREC Workshop at RecSys 2018, Vancouver. Retrieved December 5, 2021 from https://piret.gitlab.io/fatrec2018/program/fatrec2018-fields.pdf‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Jessica Fjeld, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. 2020. Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved June 10, 2021 from https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42160420Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2021. More diverse, more politically varied: How social media, search engines and aggregators shape news repertoires in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society (July 2021), 14614448211027393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027393Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Richard Fletcher and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2018. Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. 20, 7 (2018), 2450–2468. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Rachel Freedman, Rohin Shah, and Anca Dragan. 2020. Choice Set Misspecification in Reward Inference. In ICJCAI-PRICAI 2020 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety. Retrieved August 18, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07691Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Bruno S. Frey, Christine Benesch, and Aloise Stutzer. 2007. Does Watching TV Make Us Happy? 28, 3 (2007), 283–313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Batya Friedman, David G. Hendry, and Alan Borning. 2017. A survey of value sensitive design methods. 11, 23 (2017), 63–125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Batya Friedman, Peter H Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2002. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods. (2002), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Eline Frison and Steven Eggermont. 2020. Toward an Integrated and Differential Approach to the Relationships Between Loneliness, Different Types of Facebook Use, and Adolescents’ Depressed Mood. Communication Research 47, 5 (July 2020), 701–728. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215617506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  124. Adrian Furnham. 1986. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences 7, 3 (January 1986), 385–400. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. Wulf Gaertner. 2009. A Primer in Social Choice Theory: Revised Edition. OUP Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Jason Gauci, Edoardo Conti, Yitao Liang, Kittipat Virochsiri, Yuchen He, Zachary Kaden, Vivek Narayanan, Xiaohui Ye, Zhengxing Chen, and Scott Fujimoto. 2019. Horizon: Facebook's Open Source Applied Reinforcement Learning Platform. arXiv:1811.00260 [cs, stat] (September 2019). Retrieved November 30, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00260Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Sahin Cem Geyik, Stuart Ambler, and Krishnaram Kenthapadi. 2019. Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, ACM, Anchorage AK USA, 2221–2231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Alexandre Gilotte, Clément Calauzènes, Thomas Nedelec, Alexandre Abraham, and Simon Dollé. 2018. Offline A/B Testing for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ACM, Marina Del Rey CA USA, 198–206. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism. 2021. Content-Sharing Algorithms, Processes, and Positive Interventions Working Group Part 1: Content-Sharing Algorithms & Processes. Retrieved January 3, 2022 from https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GIFCT-CAPI1-2021.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Daniel Golovin, Benjamin Solnik, Subhodeep Moitra, Greg Kochanski, John Karro, and D. Sculley. 2017. Google Vizier: A Service for Black-Box Optimization. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1487–1495. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Christos Goodrow. 2021. On YouTube's recommendation system. YouTube blog. Retrieved November 19, 2021 from https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/on-youtubes-recommendation-system/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Google. 2020. Recommendation Systems Overview. Google Developers. Retrieved January 5, 2022 from https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/recommendation/overview/typesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. Google. 2021. AI At Google: Our Principles. Retrieved November 2, 2021 from https://ai.google/principles/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Mitchell L Gordon, Kaitlyn Zhou, and Michael S Bernstein. 2021. The Disagreement Deconvolution : Bringing Machine Learning Performance Metrics In Line With Reality. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3411764.3445423Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Carol Graham, Kate Laffan, and Sergio Pinto. 2018. Well-being in metrics and policy. Science 362 (6412), (2018), 287–288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Francis Green. 2011. Unpacking the misery multiplier: How employability modifies the impacts of unemployment and job insecurity on life satisfaction and mental health. 30, 2 (2011), 265–276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Ulrike Gretzel and Daniel R. Fesenmaier. 2006. Persuasion in Recommender Systems. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11, 2 (2006), 81–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Nastasia Griffioen, Marieke van Rooij, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff, and Isabela Granic. 2020. Toward improved methods in social media research. Technology, Mind, and Behavior 1, 1 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Andrew Guess, Benjamin Lyons, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2018. Avoiding the Echo Chamber about Echo Chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. Retrieved from https://kf-site-production.s3.amazonaws.com/media_elements/files/000/000/133/original/Topos_KF_White-Paper_Nyhan_V1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Viral Gupta and Yunbo Ouyang. 2020. Rise of the Machines: Removing the {Human-in-the-Loop}. In 2020 USENIX Conference on Operational Machine Learning. Retrieved January 2, 2022 from https://www.usenix.org/conference/opml20/presentation/guptaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Dylan Hadfield-Menell and Gillian K. Hadfield. 2019. Incomplete contracting and AI alignment. In AIES ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 417–422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. Alon Halevy, Cristian Canton-Ferrer, Hao Ma, Umut Ozertem, Patrick Pantel, Marzieh Saeidi, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Ves Stoyanov. 2022. Preserving integrity in online social networks. Commun. ACM 65, 2 (February 2022), 92–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3462671Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. Jaron Harambam, Dimitrios Bountouridis, Mykola Makhortykh, and Joris van Hoboken. 2019. Designing for the better by taking users into account: a qualitative evaluation of user control mechanisms in (news) recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, ACM, Copenhagen Denmark, 69–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3347014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  144. Jaron Harambam, Natali Helberger, and Joris Van Hoboken. 2018. Democratizing algorithmic news recommenders: How to materialize voice in a technologically saturated media ecosystem. 376, 2133 (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0088Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. Peter Hase and Mohit Bansal. 2020. Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior? arXiv:2005.01831 [cs] (May 2020). Retrieved September 16, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01831Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Ahmed Hassan and Ryen W. White. 2013. Personalized models of search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2009–2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. Chen He, Denis Parra, and Katrien Verbert. 2016. Interactive recommender systems: A survey of the state of the art and future research challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications 56, (2016), 9–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  148. Natali Helberger. 2019. On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders. 7, 8 (2019), 993–1012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623700Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  149. Natali Helberger, Max von Drunen, Sanne Vrijenhoek, and Judith Möller. 2021. Regulation of news recommenders in the Digital Services Act: empowering David against the Very Large Online Goliath. Internet Policy Review (2021). Retrieved July 23, 2021 from https://policyreview.info/articles/news/regulation-news-recommenders-digital-services-act-empowering-david-against-very-largeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. Natali Helberger, Kari Karppinen, and Lucia D'Acunto. 2018. Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. 21, 2 (2018), 191–207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271900Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. Natali Helberger, Paddy Leerssen, and Max Van Drunen. 2019. Germany proposes Europe's first diversity rules for social media platforms. Retrieved October 25, 2020 from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2019/05/29/germany-proposes-europes-first-diversity-rules-for-social-media-platforms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. Peter Henderson, Jieru Hu, Joshua Romoff, Emma Brunskill, Dan Jurafsky, and Joelle Pineau. 2020. Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research 21, (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. Stephen Hicks, Lucy Tinkler, and Paul Allin. 2013. Measuring Subjective Well-Being and its Potential Role in Policy: Perspectives from the UK Office for National Statistics. Soc Indic Res 114, 1 (October 2013), 73–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0384-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  154. Jennifer L. Hochschild and Katherine Levine Einstein. 2015. Do Facts Matter?: Information and Misinformation in American Politics. University of Oklahoma Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. David Holtz, Ben Carterette, Praveen Chandar, Zahra Nazari, Henriette Cramer, and Sinan Aral. 2020. The Engagement-Diversity Connection: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Spotify. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75–76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3391403.3399532Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. Homa Hosseinmardi, Amir Ghasemian, Aaron Clauset, David M. Rothschild, Markus Mobius, and Duncan J. Watts. 2020. Evaluating the scale, growth, and origins of right-wing echo chambers on YouTube. (2020). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12843Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. Silas Hsu, Kristen Vaccaro, Yin Yue, Aimee Rickman, and Karrie Karahalios. 2020. Awareness, Navigation, and Use of Feed Control Settings Online. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  158. Rosalind Hursthouse and Glen Pettigrove. 2018. Virtue Ethics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved October 21, 2021 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. Ferenc Huszár, Sofia Ira Ktena, Conor O'Brien, Luca Belli, Andrew Schlaikjer, and Moritz Hardt. 2021. Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twitter. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. Eugene Ie, Vihan Jain, Jing Wang, Sanmit Narvekar, Ritesh Agarwal, Rui Wu, Heng-Tze Cheng, Tushar Chandra, and Craig Boutilier. 2019. SlateQ: A Tractable Decomposition for Reinforcement Learning with Recommendation Sets. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, Macao, China, 2592–2599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  161. IEEE. 2020. IEEE Recommended Practice for Assessing the Impact of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems on Human Well-Being. IEEE. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9084219Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  162. IEEE. 2021. 7000-2021: IEEE Standard Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns during System Design. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9536679/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  163. Oana Ignat, Y.-Lan Boureau, Jane A. Yu, and Alon Halevy. 2021. Detecting Inspiring Content on Social Media. arXiv:2109.02734 [cs] (September 2021). Retrieved October 10, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02734Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. Simon Jackman. 2008. Measurement. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady and David Collier (eds.). Oxford University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. Abigail Z. Jacobs and Hanna Wallach. 2021. Measurement and Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM, Virtual Event Canada, 375–385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  166. Prateek Jain, Om Dipakbhai Thakkar, and Abhradeep Thakurta. 2018. Differentially Private Matrix Completion Revisited. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2215–2224. Retrieved January 7, 2022 from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/jain18b.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. Dietmar Jannach and Gediminas Adomavicius. 2016. Recommendations with a purpose. (2016), 7–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959186Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  168. Dietmar Jannach and Gediminas Adomavicius. 2017. Price and Profit Awareness in Recommender Systems. Como, Italy. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08029Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. Dietmar Jannach and Michael Jugovac. 2019. Measuring the business value of recommender systems. 10, 4 (2019), 1–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3370082Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  170. Dietmar Jannach, Ahtsham Manzoor, Wanling Cai, and Li Chen. 2021. A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 5 (June 2021), 1–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3453154Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  171. Dietmar Jannach, Sidra Naveed, and Michael Jugovac. 2017. User Control in Recommender Systems: Overview and Interaction Challenges. In E-Commerce and Web Technologies, Derek Bridge and Heiner Stuckenschmidt (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 21–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53676-7_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. Gawesh Jawaheer, Martin Szomszor, and Patty Kostkova. 2010. Comparison of implicit and explicit feedback from an online music recommendation service. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems (HetRec ’10), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1869446.1869453Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  173. Hamed Jelodar, Yongli Wang, Chi Yuan, Xia Feng, Xiahui Jiang, Yanchao Li, and Liang Zhao. 2019. Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: models, applications, a survey. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 11 (June 2019), 15169–15211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6894-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  174. Olivier Jeunen and Bart Goethals. 2021. Top-K Contextual Bandits with Equity of Exposure. In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 310–320. Retrieved November 10, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3460231.3474248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  175. Ray Jiang, Silvia Chiappa, Tor Lattimore, András György, and Pushmeet Kohli. 2019. Degenerate Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems. (February 2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  176. Yucheng Jin, Bruno Cardoso, and Katrien Verbert. 2017. How Do Different Levels of User Control Affect Cognitive Load and Acceptance of Recommendations? 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. Dimitris Kalimeris, Smriti Bhagat, Shankar Kalyanaraman, and Udi Weinsberg. 2021. Preference Amplification in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, ACM, Virtual Event Singapore, 805–815. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  178. Alex Kantrowitz. 2021. Facebook Removed The News Feed Algorithm In An Experiment. Then It Gave Up. Big Technology. Retrieved April 2, 2022 from https://bigtechnology.substack.com/p/facebook-removed-the-news-feed-algorithmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  179. Mozhgan Karimi, Dietmar Jannach, and Michael Jugovac. 2018. News recommender systems – Survey and roads ahead. 54, 6 (2018), 1203–1227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.04.008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  180. Todd B. Kashdan, Paul Rose, and Frank D. Fincham. 2004. Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment 82, 3 (June 2004), 291–305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  181. Daphne Keller. 2018. Internet platforms: Observations on speech, danger, and money. (2018), 5–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. Daphne Keller. 2021. Amplification and Its Discontents. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Retrieved March 28, 2022 from https://knightcolumbia.org/content/amplification-and-its-discontentsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. Lianne Kerlin. 2020. Human values: understanding psychological needs in a digital age. Retrieved from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp-pdf-files/WHP371.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. Douwe Kiela, Hamed Firooz, Aravind Mohan, Vedanuj Goswami, Amanpreet Singh, Pratik Ringshia, and Davide Testuggine. 2021. The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memes. arXiv:2005.04790 [cs] (April 2021). Retrieved October 10, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04790Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. Been Kim, Martin Wattenberg, Justin Gilmer, Carrie Cai, James Wexler, Fernanda Viegas, and Rory Sayres. 2018. Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV). In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2668–2677. Retrieved January 2, 2022 from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/kim18d.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  186. Heejung Kim and Deborah Ko. 2007. Culture & Self-Expression 1 Culture and Self-Expression. In Frontiers of social psychology: The self. 325–342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  187. Bart P. Knijnenburg, Saadhika Sivakumar, and Daricia Wilkinson. 2016. Recommender systems for self-actualization. (2016), 11–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  188. Christine Koggel and Joan Orme. 2010. Care Ethics: New Theories and Applications. Ethics and Social Welfare 4, 2 (July 2010), 109–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.484255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  189. Narine Kokhlikyan, Vivek Miglani, Miguel Martin, Edward Wang, Bilal Alsallakh, Jonathan Reynolds, Alexander Melnikov, Natalia Kliushkina, Carlos Araya, Siqi Yan, and Orion Reblitz-Richardson. 2020. Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch. arXiv:2009.07896 [cs, stat] (September 2020). Retrieved December 1, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07896Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. Tobias D. Krafft, Michael Gamer, and Katharina A. Zweig. 2019. What did you see? A study to measure personalization in Google's search engine. EPJ Data Sci. 8, 1 (December 2019), 38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0217-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  191. Alan B. Krueger and Arthur A. Stone. 2014. Progress in measuring subjective well-being. Science 346, 6205 (October 2014), 42–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  192. David Scott Krueger, Tegan Maharaj, and Jan Leike. 2020. Hidden incentives for auto-induced distributional shift. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  193. Caitlin Kuhlman, Walter Gerych, and Elke Rundensteiner. 2021. Measuring Group Advantage: A Comparative Study of Fair Ranking Metrics. Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’21) (May 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462588Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  194. Matevž Kunaver and Tomaž Požrl. 2017. Diversity in recommender systems – A survey. 123, (May 2017), 154–162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.02.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  195. Akos Lada, Meihong Wang, and Tak Yan. 2021. How machine learning powers Facebook's News Feed ranking algorithm. Engineering at Meta. Retrieved December 13, 2021 from https://engineering.fb.com/2021/01/26/ml-applications/news-feed-ranking/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  196. Anja Lambrecht and Catherine Tucker. 2019. Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. Management Science 65, 7 (July 2019), 2966–2981. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3093Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  197. Mark Latonero and Aaina Agarwal. 2021. Human Rights Impact Assessments for AI: Learning from Facebook's Failure in Myanmar. Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  198. Edith Law and Luis von Ahn. 2011. Human Computation. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 5, 3 (June 2011), 1–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2200/S00371ED1V01Y201107AIM013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  199. Huyen Le, Raven Maragh, Brian Ekdale, Andrew High, Timothy Havens, and Zubair Shafiq. 2019. Measuring Political Personalization of Google News Search. In The World Wide Web Conference, ACM, San Francisco CA USA, 2957–2963. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313682Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  200. Mark Ledwich and Anna Zaitsev. 2019. Algorithmic Extremism: Examining YouTube's Rabbit Hole of Radicalization. arXiv:1912.11211 [cs] (December 2019). Retrieved May 19, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11211Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  201. Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Anson Kahng, Ji Tae Kim, Xinran Yuan, Allissa Chan, Daniel See, Ritesh Noothigattu, Siheon Lee, Alexandros Psomas, and Ariel D Procaccia. 2019. Webuildai: Participatory framework for algorithmic governance. 3, (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359283Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  202. Claire Leibowicz, Connie Moon Sehat, Adriana Stephan, and Jonathan Stray. 2021. If We Want Platforms to Think Beyond Engagement, We Have to Know What We Want Instead. Retrieved November 17, 2021 from https://medium.com/partnership-on-ai/if-we-want-platforms-to-think-beyond-engagement-we-have-to-know-what-we-want-instead-a8cfbfbf6688Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  203. Jurek Leonhardt, Avishek Anand, and Megha Khosla. 2018. User Fairness in Recommender Systems. In Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW ’18, ACM Press, Lyon, France, 101–102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186949Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  204. Yunqi Li, Hanxiong Chen, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2021. User-oriented Fairness in Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 624–632. Retrieved January 2, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3449866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  205. Myles-Jay Linton, Paul Dieppe, and Antonieta Medina-Lara. 2016. Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. BMJ Open 6, 7 (July 2016), e010641. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  206. Felicia Loecherbach, Judith Moeller, Damian Trilling, and Wouter van Atteveldt. 2020. The Unified Framework of Media Diversity: A Systematic Literature Review. 8, 5 (2020), 605–642. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1764374Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  207. Felicia Loecherbach, Kasper Welbers, Judith Moeller, Damian Trilling, and Wouter Van Atteveldt. 2021. Is this a click towards diversity? Explaining when and why news users make diverse choices. In 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, ACM, Virtual Event United Kingdom, 282–290. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3447535.3462506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  208. Sahil Loomba, Alexandre de Figueiredo, Simon J. Piatek, Kristen de Graaf, and Heidi J. Larson. 2021. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav 5, 3 (March 2021), 337–348. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  209. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Lisa Oswald, Stephan Lewandowsky, and Ralph Hertwig. 2021. Digital Media and Democracy: A Systematic Review of Causal and Correlational Evidence Worldwide. SocArXiv. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/p3z9vGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  210. Raphael Louca, Moumita Bhattacharya, Diane Hu, and Liangjie Hong. 2019. Joint Optimization of Profit and Relevance for Recommendation Systems in E-commerce. 2440, (2019), 4–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  211. Justina Lukat, Jürgen Margraf, Rainer Lutz, William M. van der Veld, and Eni S. Becker. 2016. Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale). BMC Psychology 4, 1 (February 2016), 8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0111-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  212. Glenn P. Malone, David R. Pillow, and Augustine Osman. 2012. The General Belongingness Scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences 52, 3 (February 2012), 311–316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  213. David Manheim and Scott Garrabrant. 2018. Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law. (2018), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  214. Joel Eduardo Martinez and Elizabeth Levy Paluck. 2020. Quantifying shared and idiosyncratic judgments of racism in social discourse. (2020). Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/kfpjgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  215. Sara Mattingly-Jordan, Bob Donaldson, Phillip Gray, and L Maria Ingram. 2019. Ethically Alsigned Design First Edition Glossary. Retrieved from https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead1e_glossary.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  216. Nicolas Mattis, Philipp Masur, Judith Möller, and Wouter van Atteveldt. 2021. A theoretical framework for facilitating diverse news consumption through recommender design. SocArXiv (2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/wvxf5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  217. Colum Mccaffery. 2020. An algorithm for empowering public service news. Polis. Retrieved October 8, 2021 from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2020/09/28/this-swedish-radio-algorithm-gets-reporters-out-in-society/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  218. Jennifer McCoy and Murat Somer. 2019. Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, 1 (January 2019), 234–271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  219. David W. McMillan and David M. Chavis. 1986. Sense of community: A definition and theory. J. Community Psychol. 14, 1 (January 1986), 6–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-IGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  220. Alan Meca. 2012. Personal Control and Responsibility Measure: A Psychometric Evaluation. Master of Science Psychology. Florida International University. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI12072703Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  221. Rishabh Mehrotra, Ashton Anderson, Fernando Diaz, Amit Sharma, Hanna Wallach, and Emine Yilmaz. 2017. Auditing search engines for differential satisfaction across demographics. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on World Wide Web companion, 626–633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  222. Rishabh Mehrotra, James McInerney, Hugues Bouchard, Mounia Lalmas, and Fernando Diaz. 2018. Towards a Fair Marketplace: Counterfactual Evaluation of the trade-off between Relevance, Fairness & Satisfaction in Recommendation Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2243–2251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3269206.3272027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  223. Rishabh Mehrotra, Niannan Xue, and Mounia Lalmas. 2020. Bandit based Optimization of Multiple Objectives on a Music Streaming Platform. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3224–3233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  224. Christoph J. Meinrenken, Scott M. Kaufman, Siddharth Ramesh, and Klaus S. Lackner. 2012. Fast Carbon Footprinting for Large Product Portfolios. 16, 5 (2012), 669–679. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00463.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  225. Claire Midgley, Sabrina Thai, Penelope Lockwood, Chloe Kovacheff, and Elizabeth Page-Gould. 2021. When every day is a high school reunion: Social media comparisons and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 121, 2 (August 2021), 285–307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000336Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  226. Silvia Milano, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2020. Recommender systems and their ethical challenges. AI & Soc 35, 4 (December 2020), 957–967. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00950-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  227. Smitha Milli, Luca Belli, and Moritz Hardt. 2020. From Optimizing Engagement to Measuring Value. (2020), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  228. Martin Mladenov, Elliot Creager, Omer Ben-Porat, Kevin Swersky, Richard Zemel, and Craig Boutilier. 2020. Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approach. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 6987–6998. Retrieved January 2, 2022 from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/mladenov20a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  229. Martin Mladenov, Ofer Meshi, Jayden Ooi, Dale Schuurmans, and Craig Boutilier. 2019. Advantage Amplification in Slowly Evolving Latent-State Environments. 2019-Augus, (May 2019), 3165–3172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/439Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  230. Haradhan Kumar Mohajan. 2017. Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. ASHU- ES 17, 4 (December 2017), 59–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26458/1746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  231. Judith Möller, Damian Trilling, Natali Helberger, and Bram van Es. 2018. Do not blame it on the algorithm: an empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. 21, 7 (July 2018), 959–977. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  232. Marlon Mooijman, Joe Hoover, Ying Lin, Heng Ji, and Morteza Dehghani. 2018. Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests. Nat Hum Behav 2, 6 (June 2018), 389–396. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0353-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  233. Meredith Ringel Morris, Annuska Zolyomi, Catherine Yao, Sina Bahram, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Shaun K. Kane. 2016. “With most of it being pictures now, I rarely use it”: Understanding Twitter's Evolving Accessibility to Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, San Jose California USA, 5506–5516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  234. Mozilla. 2021. How Artificial Intelligence Fuels Online Disinformation: Relevant Legislation. Mozilla Foundation. Retrieved November 19, 2021 from https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/campaigns/trained-for-deception-how-artificial-intelligence-fuels-online-disinformation/relevant-legislation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  235. Sendhil Mullainathan and Ziad Obermeyer. 2021. On the Inequity of Predicting A While Hoping for B. AEA Papers and Proceedings 111, (May 2021), 37–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211078Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  236. Kevin Munger and Joseph Phillips. 2020. Right-Wing YouTube: A Supply and Demand Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics (October 2020), 194016122096476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220964767Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  237. Luke Munn. 2019. Alt-right pipeline: Individual journeys to extremism online. First Monday (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i6.10108Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  238. Robin L. Nabi, Abby Prestin, and Jiyeon So. 2013. Facebook Friends with (Health) Benefits? Exploring Social Network Site Use and Perceptions of Social Support, Stress, and Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, 10 (October 2013), 721–727. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0521Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  239. Anatol-Fiete Näher and Ivar Krumpal. 2012. Asking sensitive questions: the impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability bias. Qual Quant 46, 5 (August 2012), 1601–1616. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9469-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  240. Arvind Narayanan, Joanna Huey, and Edward W. Felten. 2016. A Precautionary Approach to Big Data Privacy. In Data Protection on the Move: Current Developments in ICT and Privacy/Data Protection, Serge Gutwirth, Ronald Leenes and Paul De Hert (eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 357–385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7376-8_13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  241. Menaka Narayanan, Emily Chen, Jeffrey He, Been Kim, Sam Gershman, and Finale Doshi-Velez. 2018. How do Humans Understand Explanations from Machine Learning Systems? An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation. arXiv:1802.00682 [cs] (February 2018). Retrieved January 5, 2022 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  242. National Opinion Research Center. 2013. General Social Survey Cumulative File 1972-2012. Retrieved November 11, 2021 from http://people.wku.edu/douglas.smith/GSS%201972_2012%20Codebook.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  243. Esinath Ndiweni and Welcome Sibanda. 2020. CSR governance framework of South Africa, pre, during and post-apartheid: a manifestation of ubuntu values? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 14, 4 (January 2020), 363–383. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2020.110820Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  244. Efrat Nechushtai and Seth C. Lewis. 2019. What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. 90, (2019), 298–307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  245. Elizabeth A. Nick, David A. Cole, Sun-Joo Cho, Darcy K. Smith, T. Grace Carter, and Rachel Zelkowitz. 2018. The Online Social Support Scale: Measure Development and Validation. Psychol Assess 30, 9 (September 2018), 1127–1143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  246. Nima Noorshams, Saurabh Verma, and Aude Hofleitner. 2020. TIES: Temporal Interaction Embeddings for Enhancing Social Media Integrity at Facebook. (2020), 3128–3135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  247. Norwegian Centre for Research Data. 2012. ESS Round 6: European Social Survey Round 6 Data (2012). Retrieved November 15, 2021 from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/themes.html?t=personalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  248. Ingrid Nunes and Dietmar Jannach. 2017. A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems. User Model User-Adap Inter 27, 3 (December 2017), 393–444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9195-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  249. Brendan Nyhan, Jaime Settle, Emily Thorson, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Pablo Barberá, Annie Y. Chen, Hunt Allcott, Taylor Brown, Adriana Crespo-Tenorio, Drew Dimmery, Deen Freelon, Matthew Gentzkow, Sandra González-Bailón, Andrew M. Guess, Edward Kennedy, Young Mie Kim, David Lazer, Neil Malhotra, Devra Moehler, Jennifer Pan, Daniel Robert Thomas, Rebekah Tromble, Carlos Velasco Rivera, Arjun Wilkins, Beixian Xiong, Chad Kiewiet de Jonge, Annie Franco, Winter Mason, Natalie Jomini Stroud, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2023. Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing. Nature (July 2023), 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06297-wGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  250. Gus O'Donnell, Angus Deaton, Martine Durand, David Halpern, and Richard Layard. 2014. Wellbeing and Policy. Retrieved from https://li.com/reports/the-commission-on-wellbeing-and-policy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  251. OECD. 2019. Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data: Reconciling Risks and Benefits for Data Re-use across Societies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/enhancing-access-to-and-sharing-of-data_276aaca8-enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  252. OECD. 2020. Better Life Index. Retrieved November 11, 2021 from https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  253. Mathieu O'Neil and Michael J Jensen. 2020. Australian Perspectives on Misinformation. News Media Research Centre, University of Canberra. Retrieved from https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/australian-perspectives-on-misinformationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  254. Elinor Ostrom. 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. 14, 3 (2000), 137–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  255. Aviv Ovadya. 2021. Towards Platform Democracy: Policymaking Beyond Corporate CEOs and Partisan Pressure. Retrieved December 8, 2021 from https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/towards-platform-democracy-policymaking-beyond-corporate-ceos-and-partisan-pressureGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  256. Shanto p, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J Westwood. 2018. The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. (2018), 1–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  257. Elisabeth Pacherie. 2007. The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency. Psyche 13, 1 (2007), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  258. Stefania Paolini, Jake Harwood, and Mark Rubin. 2010. Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 36, 12 (December 2010), 1723–1738. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210388667Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  259. Jana Papcunová, Marcel Martončik, Denisa Fedáková, Michal Kentoš, Miroslava Bozogáňová, Ivan Srba, Robert Moro, Matúš Pikuliak, Marián Šimko, and Matúš Adamkovič. 2021. Hate speech operationalization: a preliminary examination of hate speech indicators and their structure. Complex Intell. Syst. (October 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00561-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  260. Jen Patja Howell, Evelyn Douek, Quinta Jurecic, and David Kaye. 2021. The Arrival of International Human Rights Law in Content Moderation. The Lawfare Podcast. Retrieved December 17, 2021 from https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-podcast-arrival-international-human-rights-law-content-moderationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  261. Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand. 2019. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 7 (February 2019), 2521–2526. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  262. Gordon Pennycook and David Gertler Rand. 2021. Reducing the spread of fake news by shifting attention to accuracy: Meta-analytic evidence of replicability and generalizability. PsyArXiv. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/v8rujGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  263. Thomas F. Pettigrew and Linda R. Tropp. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. 90, 5 (2006), 751–783. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  264. Matteo Pinna, Léo Picard, and Christoph Goessmann. 2021. Cable News and COVID-19 Vaccine Compliance. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890340Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  265. Markus Prior. 2013. Media and Political Polarization. 16, (2013), 101–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  266. Andrew K. Przybylski and Netta Weinstein. 2017. A Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: Quantifying the Relations Between Digital-Screen Use and the Mental Well-Being of Adolescents. Psychol Sci 28, 2 (February 2017), 204–215. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  267. Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2010. A User-Centric Evaluation Framework of Recommender Systems. 612, (2010), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  268. Tao Qi, Fangzhao Wu, Chuhan Wu, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. 2020. Privacy-Preserving News Recommendation Model Learning. arXiv:2003.09592 [cs] (October 2020). Retrieved December 8, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.09592Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  269. Kevin M. Quinn, Burt L. Monroe, Michael Colaresi, Michael H. Crespin, and Dragomir R. Radev. 2010. How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs. American Journal of Political Science 54, 1 (2010), 209–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  270. Amifa Raj and Michael D. Ekstrand. 2022. Measuring Fairness in Ranked Results. (2022), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  271. Amifa Raj, Connor Wood, Ananda Montoly, and Michael D. Ekstrand. 2020. Comparing Fair Ranking Metrics. arXiv:2009.01311 [cs] (September 2020). Retrieved November 10, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01311Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  272. Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Andrew Smart, Rebecca N. White, Margaret Mitchell, Timnit Gebru, Ben Hutchinson, Jamila Smith-Loud, Daniel Theron, and Parker Barnes. 2020. Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 33–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  273. Ranking Digital Rights. 2020. 2020 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index. Ranking Digital Rights. Retrieved April 19, 2022 from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2020/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  274. Carl Edward Rasmussen and Christopher K. I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  275. Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virgílio A. F. Almeida, and Wagner Meira. 2020. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131–141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  276. Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virgílio A.F. Almeida, and W. M. Wagner Meira. 2020. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20), Barcelona, 131–141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  277. Samantha Robertson and Niloufar Salehi. 2020. What If I Don't Like Any Of The Choices? The Limits of Preference Elicitation for Participatory Algorithm Design. arXiv:2007.06718 [cs] (July 2020). Retrieved June 1, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.06718Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  278. Jo Robinson, Georgina Cox, Eleanor Bailey, Sarah Hetrick, Maria Rodrigues, Steve Fisher, and Helen Herrman. 2016. Social media and suicide prevention: a systematic review: Suicide prevention and social media. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 10, 2 (April 2016), 103–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12229Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  279. David Rolnick, Priya L. Donti, Lynn H. Kaack, Kelly Kochanski, Alexandre Lacoste, Kris Sankaran, Andrew Slavin Ross, Nikola Milojevic-Dupont, Natasha Jaques, Anna Waldman-Brown, Alexandra Luccioni, Tegan Maharaj, Evan D. Sherwin, S. Karthik Mukkavilli, Konrad P. Kording, Carla Gomes, Andrew Y. Ng, Demis Hassabis, John C. Platt, Felix Creutzig, Jennifer Chayes, and Yoshua Bengio. 2019. Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning. (June 2019). Retrieved September 26, 2019 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05433Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  280. Kevin Roose. 2019. The Making of a YouTube Radical. Retrieved April 5, 2021 from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/08/technology/youtube-radical.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  281. Brent D. Rosso, Kathryn H. Dekas, and Amy Wrzesniewski. 2010. On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior 30, (January 2010), 91–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  282. Cynthia Rudin. 2019. Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead. arXiv:1811.10154 [cs, stat] (September 2019). Retrieved November 23, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10154Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  283. Stuart Russell. 2019. Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  284. Agnieszka Rychwalska and Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska. 2018. Polarization on Social Media: When Group Dynamics Leads to Societal Divides. (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.263Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  285. Carol D Ryff and Corey Lee M Keyes. 1995. The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 4 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  286. Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cedric Langbort. 2014. Auditing Algorithms: Research Methods for Detecting Discrimination on Internet Platforms.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  287. Maarten Sap, Swabha Swayamdipta, Laura Vianna, Xuhui Zhou, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. 2021. Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection. arXiv:2111.07997 [cs] (November 2021). Retrieved November 30, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  288. Piotr Sapiezynski, Wesley Zeng, Ronald E. Robertson, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Quantifying the Impact of User Attention on Fair Group Representation in Ranked Lists. arXiv:1901.10437 [cs] (May 2019). Retrieved December 2, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10437Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  289. Stephen G. Sapp and Wendy J. Harrod. 1993. Reliability and Validity of a Brief Version of Levenson's Locus of Control Scale. Psychol Rep 72, 2 (April 1993), 539–550. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  290. Martin Saveski, Brandon Roy, and Deb Roy. 2021. The Structure of Toxic Conversations on Twitter. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (April 2021), 1086–1097. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3449861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  291. Daniel Schiff, Aladdin Ayesh, Laura Musikanski, and John C. Havens. 2020. IEEE 7010: A New Standard for Assessing the Well-being Implications of Artificial Intelligence. (2020). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06620Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  292. Tobias Schnabel, Saleema Amershi, Paul N. Bennett, Peter Bailey, and Thorsten Joachims. 2020. The Impact of More Transparent Interfaces on Behavior in Personalized Recommendation. (2020), 991–1000. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  293. Shalom H. Schwartz. 2012. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1 (December 2012). DOI:https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  294. Amartya Sen. 2017. Collective choice and social welfare. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  295. Brittany Seymour, Rebekah Getman, Avinash Saraf, Lily H. Zhang, and Elsbeth Kalenderian. 2015. When Advocacy Obscures Accuracy Online: Digital Pandemics of Public Health Misinformation Through an Antifluoride Case Study. Am J Public Health 105, 3 (March 2015), 517–523. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302437Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  296. Holly B. Shakya and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2017. Association of Facebook Use With Compromised Well-Being: A Longitudinal Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. (January 2017), amjepid;kww189v2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww189Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  297. Guy Shani, David Heckerman, and Ronen I. Brafman. 2005. An MDP-Based Recommender System. Journal of Machine Learning Research 6, 43 (2005), 1265–1295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  298. Elizabeth Hansen Shapiro, Michael Sugarman, Fernando Bermejo Media, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2021. New approaches to Platform Data Research. Retrieved from https://www.netgainpartnership.org/events/2021/2/26/new-approaches-to-platform-data-researchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  299. Helaine Silverman and D. Fairchild Ruggles. 2007. Cultural Heritage and Human Rights. In Cultural Heritage and Human Rights, Helaine Silverman and D. Fairchild Ruggles (eds.). Springer, New York, NY, 3–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71313-7_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  300. Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson. 2012. Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  301. Ashudeep Singh, Yoni Halpern, Nithum Thain, Konstantina Christakopoulou, Ed H Chi, Jilin Chen, and Alex Beutel. 2021. Building Healthy Recommendation Sequences for Everyone:A Safe Reinforcement Learning Approach. (2021), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  302. Ashudeep Singh and Thorsten Joachims. 2018. Fairness of Exposure in Rankings. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2219–2228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3220088Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  303. Spandana Singh. 2020. Regulating Platform Algorithms: Approaches for EU and U.S. Policymakers. Retrieved December 17, 2021 from http://newamerica.org/oti/briefs/regulating-platform-algorithms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  304. Spandana Singh. 2020. Special Delivery: How Internet Platforms Use Artificial Intelligence to Target and Deliver Ads. New America Foundation. Retrieved January 5, 2022 from http://newamerica.org/oti/reports/special-delivery/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  305. Spandana Singh. 2020. Promoting Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Around Algorithmic Recommendation Practices. New America. Retrieved November 19, 2021 from http://newamerica.org/oti/reports/why-am-i-seeing-this/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  306. Spandana Singh. 2021. Charting a Path Forward. Retrieved December 20, 2021 from http://newamerica.org/oti/reports/charting-path-forward/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  307. Spandana Singh and Leila Doty. 2021. Cracking Open the Black Box. New America Foundation. Retrieved November 30, 2021 from http://newamerica.org/oti/reports/cracking-open-the-black-box/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  308. Spandana Singh and Leila Doty. 2021. The Transparency Report Tracking Tool: How Internet Platforms Are Reporting on the Enforcement of Their Content Rules. New America. Retrieved October 9, 2021 from http://newamerica.org/oti/reports/transparency-report-tracking-tool/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  309. Eva E. A. Skoe. 2014. Measuring care-based moral development: The Ethic of Care Interview. Behavioral Development Bulletin 19, 3 (September 2014), 95–104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  310. Ben Smith. 2021. How TikTok Reads Your Mind. The New York Times. Retrieved December 6, 2021 from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/05/business/media/tiktok-algorithm.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  311. Jannick Kirk Sørensen and Jonathon Hutchinson. 2018. Algorithms and Public Service Media. In Public Service Media in the Networked Society. 91–106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  312. Dayana Spagnuelo, Cesare Bartolini, and Gabriele Lenzini. 2016. Metrics for Transparency. In Data Privacy Management and Security Assurance, Giovanni Livraga, Vicenç Torra, Alessandro Aldini, Fabio Martinelli and Neeraj Suri (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47072-6_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  313. Elizabeth A Stanton. 2007. The Human Development Index: A History. PERI Working Papers 127, (2007). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/peri_workingpapers/85/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  314. Michael F. Steger, Bryan J. Dik, and Ryan D. Duffy. 2012. Measuring Meaningful Work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment 20, 3 (August 2012), 322–337. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  315. Charles Steinfield, Nicole B. Ellison, and Cliff Lampe. 2008. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 6 (November 2008), 434–445. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  316. Jacquelien van Stekelenburg. 2014. Going all the way: Politicizing, polarizing, and radicalizing identity offline and online. 8, 5 (2014), 540–555. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12157Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  317. James W. Stoutenborough, Scott E. Robinson, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2016. Is “fracking” a new dirty word? The influence of word choice on public views toward natural gas attitudes. Energy Research & Social Science 17, (July 2016), 52–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  318. Milton E. Strauss and Gregory T. Smith. 2009. Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 5, (April 2009), 1–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  319. Jonathan Stray. 2012. Who should see what when? Three principles for personalized news. Nieman Lab. Retrieved June 15, 2021 from https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/07/who-should-see-what-when-three-principles-for-personalized-news/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  320. Jonathan Stray. 2020. Aligning AI Optimization to Community Well-being. International Journal of Community Well-Being 3, (2020), 443–463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00086-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  321. Jonathan Stray. 2021. Designing Recommender Systems to Depolarize. First Monday (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  322. Jonathan Stray. 2021. Show me the algorithm: Transparency in recommendation systems. Schwartz Reisman Institute. Retrieved October 4, 2021 from https://srinstitute.utoronto.ca/news/recommendation-systems-transparencyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  323. Jonathan Stray, Ravi Iyer, and Helena Puig Larrauri. 2023. The Algorithmic Management of Polarization and Violence on Social Media. Kinght First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, New York, NY. Retrieved June 8, 2023 from https://knightcolumbia.org/content/the-algorithmic-management-of-polarization-and-violence-on-social-mediaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  324. Natalie Jomini Stroud, Ashley Muddiman, and Joshua M Scacco. 2017. Like, recommend, or respect? Altering political behavior in news comment sections. New Media & Society 19, 11 (November 2017), 1727–1743. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816642420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  325. Sara Su. 2017. New Test With Related Articles. Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved September 19, 2021 from https://about.fb.com/news/2017/04/news-feed-fyi-new-test-with-related-articles/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  326. Kaveri Subrahmanyam, Stephanie M. Reich, Natalia Waechter, and Guadalupe Espinoza. 2008. Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 6 (November 2008), 420–433. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  327. J. L. Sullivan and J. E. Transue. 1999. The Psychological Underpinnings of Democracy: A Selective Review of Research on Political Tolerance, Interpersonal Trust, and Social Capital. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 1 (February 1999), 625–650. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.625Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  328. Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. 2017. Gradients of Counterfactuals. arXiv:1611.02639 [cs] (2017). Retrieved December 1, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02639Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  329. Nicolas Suzor, Tess Van Geelen, and Sarah Myers West. 2018. Evaluating the legitimacy of platform governance: A review of research and a shared research agenda. International Communication Gazette 80, 4 (June 2018), 385–400. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  330. Nima Taghipour, Ahmad Kardan, and Saeed Shiry Ghidary. 2007. Usage-based web recommendations: a reinforcement learning approach. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems (RecSys ’07), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 113–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1297231.1297250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  331. Ruth Tennant, Louise Hiller, Ruth Fishwick, Stephen Platt, Stephen Joseph, Scott Weich, Jane Parkinson, Jenny Secker, and Sarah Stewart-Brown. 2007. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 5, 1 (November 2007), 63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  332. The Markup. 2020. The Citizen Browser Project—Auditing the Algorithms of Disinformation. Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://themarkup.org/citizen-browserGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  333. Nicolas Thompson. 2018. How Facebook Wants to Improve the Quality of Your News Feed | WIRED. Wired. Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://www.wired.com/story/how-facebook-wants-to-improve-the-quality-of-your-news-feed/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  334. Luke Thorburn, Jonathan Stray, and Priyanjana Bengani. 2022. What Does it Mean to Give Someone What They Want? The Nature of Preferences in Recommender Systems. Understanding Recommenders. Retrieved March 25, 2022 from https://medium.com/understanding-recommenders/what-does-it-mean-to-give-someone-what-they-want-the-nature-of-preferences-in-recommender-systems-82b5a1559157Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  335. Luke Thorburn, Jonathan Stray, and Priyanjana Bengani. 2022. What Will “Amplification” Mean in Court? Tech Policy Press. Retrieved June 30, 2022 from https://techpolicy.press/what-will-amplification-mean-in-court/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  336. Todd Thrash and Andrew Elliot. 2003. Inspiration as a Psychological Construct. Journal of personality and social psychology 84, (May 2003), 871–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  337. Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2015. Explaining Recommendations: Design and Evaluation. In Recommender Systems Handbook, Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach and Bracha Shapira (eds.). Springer US, Boston, MA, 353–382. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  338. Christian Winther Topp, Søren Dinesen Østergaard, Susan Søndergaard, and Per Bech. 2015. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Psychother Psychosom 84, 3 (2015), 167–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1159/000376585Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  339. Petter Törnberg. 2022. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, 42 (October 2022), e2207159119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207159119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  340. UK Office of National Statistics. 2019. Measuring national well-being: domains and measures. Retrieved November 11, 2021 from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/datasets/measuringnationalwellbeingdomainsandmeasuresGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  341. UN General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world : the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  342. UNESCO. 1978. Declaration on Fundamental Principles concerning the Contribution of the Mass Media to Strengthening Peace and International Understanding, to the Promotion of Human Rights and to Countering Racialism, apartheid and incitement to war. Retrieved December 8, 2021 from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13176&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  343. UNESCO. 2005. Convention for the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. Retrieved December 8, 2021 from https://en.unesco.org/creativity/convention/textsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  344. UNESCO. 2017. Declaration of Ethical Principles in relation to Climate Change. Retrieved December 2, 2021 from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=49457&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  345. United Nations. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved November 2, 2021 from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  346. United Nations. 1969. Declaration on Social Progress and Development. Retrieved November 2, 2021 from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/progressanddevelopment.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  347. Université de Montréal. 2018. Montreal Declaration for a Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved November 2, 2021 from https://www.montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com/the-declarationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  348. Kristen Vaccaro, Dylan Huang, Motahhare Eslami, Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, and Karrie Karahalios. 2018. The Illusion of Control: Placebo Effects of Control Settings. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173590Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  349. Sebastián Valenzuela, Namsu Park, and Kerk F. Kee. 2009. Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 4 (July 2009), 875–901. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  350. Shannon Vallor. 2016. Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford University Press, New York. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190498511.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  351. Shannon Vallor, Irina Raicu, and Brian Green. 2020. Technology and Engineering Practice: Ethical Lenses to Look Through. The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. Retrieved from https://www.scu.edu/media/ethics-center/technology-ethics/Tech_and_Engineering_Practice-Ethical_Lenses-2020.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  352. Lav R. Varshney. 2020. Respect for Human Autonomy in Recommender Systems. arXiv:2009.02603 [cs] (September 2020). Retrieved October 14, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02603Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  353. Briana Vecchione, Solon Barocas, and Karen Levy. 2021. Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studies. arXiv:2109.06974 [cs] (September 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3465416.3483294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  354. Philippe Verduyn, Oscar Ybarra, Maxime Résibois, John Jonides, and Ethan Kross. 2017. Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well-Being? A Critical Review. 11, 1 (January 2017), 274–302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  355. Eric S Vorm and Andrew D Miller. 2018. Assessing the Value of Transparency in Recommender Systems: An End-User Perspective. (2018), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  356. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. 359, 6380 (March 2018), 1146–1151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  357. Sanne Vrijenhoek, Mesut Kaya, Nadia Metoui, Judith Möller, Daan Odijk, and Natali Helberger. 2020. Recommenders with a mission: assessing diversity in news recommendations. 1, 1 (December 2020), 554–561. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_38Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  358. Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, and Chris Russell. 2017. Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR. (2017), 1–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063289Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  359. Annika Waern. 2004. User Involvement in Automatic Filtering: An Experimental Study. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 14, (June 2004), 201–237. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:USER.0000028984.13876.9bGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  360. Wall Street Journal. 2021. Inside TikTok's Algorithm: A WSJ Video Investigation. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://www.wsj.com/articles/tiktok-algorithm-video-investigation-11626877477Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  361. Lequn Wang and Thorsten Joachims. 2021. User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Markets. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, 23–41. Retrieved January 2, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3471158.3472260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  362. Washingtonian. 2019. What Happened After My 13-Year-Old Son Joined the Alt-Right. Washingtonian. Retrieved January 3, 2022 from https://www.washingtonian.com/2019/05/05/what-happened-after-my-13-year-old-son-joined-the-alt-right/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  363. David Watson, Lee Anna, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. (1988), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  364. Pamela Weaver, Jeong Choi, and Tammie Kaufman. 1997. Question Wording and Response Bias: Students’ Perceptions of Ethical Issues in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education 9, 2 (April 1997), 21–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.1997.10685307Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  365. Stephanie Weiser. 2019. Requirements of Trustworthy AI. FUTURIUM - European Commission. Retrieved October 21, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation/guidelines/1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  366. Dan Weld and Gagan Bansal. 2019. The challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence. Communications of the ACM 62, 6 (2019), 70–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  367. Judith B. White, Ellen J. Langer, Leeat Yariv, and John C. Welch. 2006. Frequent Social Comparisons and Destructive Emotions and Behaviors: The Dark Side of Social Comparisons. J Adult Dev 13, 1 (March 2006), 36–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-006-9005-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  368. Joe Whittaker, Seán Looney, Alastair Reed, and Fabio Votta. 2021. Recommender systems and the amplification of extremist content. Internet Policy Review 10, 2 (June 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1565Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  369. Mark Wilhelm, Ajith Ramanathan, Alexander Bonomo, Sagar Jain, Ed H. Chi, and Jennifer Gillenwater. 2018. Practical Diversified Recommendations on YouTube with Determinantal Point Processes. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2165–2173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3269206.3272018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  370. Ceri Wilson and Jenny Secker. 2015. Validation of the Social Inclusion Scale with Students. Social Inclusion 3, 4 (July 2015), 52–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i4.121Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  371. World Health Organization. 2004. Promoting Mental Health. World Health Organization, Geneva. Retrieved November 15, 2021 from https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=4978588Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  372. World Values Survey. 2020. WVS Wave 7. Retrieved November 11, 2021 from https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  373. Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Yang Cao, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. 2021. FedGNN: Federated Graph Neural Network for Privacy-Preserving Recommendation. arXiv:2102.04925 [cs] (March 2021). Retrieved December 8, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04925Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  374. Haolun Wu, Chen Ma, Bhaskar Mitra, Fernando Diaz, and Xue Liu. 2021. Multi-FR: A Multi-Objective Optimization Method for Achieving Two-sided Fairness in E-commerce Recommendation. arXiv:2105.02951 [cs] (May 2021). Retrieved December 2, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02951Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  375. Haolun Wu, Bhaskar Mitra, Chen Ma, Fernando Diaz, and Xue Liu. 2022. Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation. (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  376. Yikun Xian, Tong Zhao, Jin Li, Jim Chan, Andrey Kan, Jun Ma, Xin Luna Dong, Christos Faloutsos, George Karypis, S. Muthukrishnan, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2021. EX3: Explainable Attribute-aware Item-set Recommendations. In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 484–494. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3460231.3474240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  377. Hao Yan, Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft, Micah Goodman, Melissa Krauss, Sanmay Das, and Patricia Cavazos-Rehg. 2019. Automatic detection of eating disorder-related social media posts that could benefit from a mental health intervention. Int J Eat Disord 52, 10 (October 2019), 1150–1156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  378. Moran Yarchi, Christian Baden, and Neta Kligler-Vilenchik. 2021. Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media. Political Communication 38, 1–2 (March 2021), 98–139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  379. Xing Yi, Liangjie Hong, Erheng Zhong, Nathan Nan Liu, and Suju Rajan. 2014. Beyond clicks: Dwell time for personalization. (2014), 113–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2645710.2645724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  380. Jillian York and Ethan Zuckerman. 2019. Moderating the Public Sphere. In Rikke Frank Jørgensen (ed.). MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  381. Yang Yu, Sen Luo, Shenglan Liu, Hong Qiao, Yang Liu, and Lin Feng. 2020. Deep attention based music genre classification. Neurocomputing 372, (January 2020), 84–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  382. Hamed Zamani, Markus Schedl, Paul Lamere, and Ching-Wei Chen. 2019. An Analysis of Approaches Taken in the ACM RecSys Challenge 2018 for Automatic Music Playlist Continuation. arXiv:1810.01520 [cs] (August 2019). Retrieved December 8, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01520Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  383. Meike Zehlike, Ke Yang, and Julia Stoyanovich. 2021. Fairness in Ranking: A Survey. arXiv:2103.14000 [cs] (May 2021). Retrieved December 2, 2021 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.14000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  384. Meike Zehlike, Ke Yang, and Julia Stoyanovich. 2022. Fairness in Ranking, Part I: Score-based Ranking. ACM Comput. Surv. (April 2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3533379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  385. Amy X. Zhang, Grant Hugh, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2020. PolicyKit: Building governance in online communities. (2020), 365–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415858Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  386. Yongfeng Zhang and Xu Chen. 2020. Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives. 14, 1 (2020), 1–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000066.YongfengGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  387. Xiangyu Zhao, Changsheng Gu, Haoshenglun Zhang, Xiwang Yang, Xiaobing Liu, Jiliang Tang, and Hui Liu. 2021. DEAR: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Online Advertising Impression in Recommender Systems. arXiv:1909.03602 [cs] (May 2021). Retrieved April 24, 2022 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03602Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  388. Xiaoxue Zhao, Weinan Zhang, and Jun Wang. 2013. Interactive collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1411–1420. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505690Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  389. Zhe Zhao, Lichan Hong, Li Wei, Jilin Chen, Aniruddh Nath, Shawn Andrews, Aditee Kumthekar, Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy, Xinyang Yi, and Ed Chi. 2019. Recommending what video to watch next. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3346997Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  390. Cai-Nicolas Ziegler, Sean M. McNee, Joseph A. Konstan, and Georg Lausen. 2005. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1060745.1060754Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  391. Gregory D. Zimet, Nancy W. Dahlem, Sara G. Zimet, and Gordon K. Farley. 1988. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment 52, 1 (March 1988), 30–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  392. Frederik J Zuiderveen Borgesius, Damian Trilling, Judith Möller, Balázs Bodó, Claes H. de Vreese, and Natali Helberger. 2016. Should we worry about filter bubbles? 5, 1 (2016), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.401Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems
    ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems Just Accepted
    EISSN:2770-6699
    Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2023 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Online AM: 13 November 2023
    • Accepted: 2 October 2023
    • Revised: 13 June 2023
    • Received: 31 October 2022
    Published in tors Just Accepted

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader