Astrophysics
[Submitted on 20 Apr 2006 (v1), last revised 23 Jun 2006 (this version, v2)]
Title:Implications of WMAP 3 Year Data for the Sources of Reionization
View PDFAbstract: New results on the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and its polarization based on the first 3 years of data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) have revised the electron scattering optical depth downward from tau_es=0.17+0.08-0.07 to tau_es=0.09+/-0.03. This implies a shift of the effective reionization redshift from z_r~17 to z_r~11. Previous attempts to explain the high redshift of reionization inferred from the WMAP 1 year data have led to widespread speculation that the sources of reionization must have been much more efficient than those associated with the star formation observed at low redshift. This is consistent, for example, with the suggestion that early star formation involved massive, Population III stars that early on produced most of the ionizing radiation escaping from halos. It is therefore tempting to interpret the new WMAP results as implying that we can now relax those previous high demands on the efficiency of the sources of reionization and perhaps even turn the argument around as evidence against such high efficiency. We show that this is not the case, however. The new WMAP results also find that the primordial density fluctuation power spectrum has a lower amplitude, sigma_8, and departs substantially from the scale-invariant spectrum. We show that these effects combine to cancel the impact of the later reionization implied by the new value of tau_es on the required ionizing efficiency per collapsed baryon. The delay of reionization is surprisingly well matched by a comparable delay (by a factor of ~1.4 in scale factor) in the formation of the halos responsible for reionization.
Submission history
From: Marcelo Alvarez [view email][v1] Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:48:57 UTC (28 KB)
[v2] Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:50:23 UTC (35 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.